Top Shelf

Having just the vision’s no solution,
everything depends on execution,
Putting it together.
–Stephen Sondheim

Last week I wrote about the new vision for 21st century libraries that we have adopted in our district. In the process of creating this vision, we also revised our mission statement.

Our guide in this process was the book, Failure Is NOT and Option: Six Principles That Guide Student Achievement in High Performing Schools by Alan Blankenstein, which lists having a common mission and vision as the #1 principle for success.

Creating a mission statement according to the guidelines in this book was a little bit different than other processes I have used in the past. We all know that a mission statement gives the people involved with an organization a clear understanding of its purpose for existence. Blankenstein, however, finds fault with the typical mission statement. He says:

A quick survey of mission statements reveals a common pattern. They use superlatives and absolutes. Such an approach leaves people feeling as though they had cotton candy for lunch: happy but still hungry for the real meal! Phrases like “world’s best,” “premier,” “largest,” and “first choice of customers everywhere” abound. How “premier” status will be attained and how “best” will be measured are rarely clarified or discussed. Schools and school districts also have mission statements – and they should. Unfortunately, education is not exempt from the tendency toward generic, vague and meaningless mission statements.

In order to create a more effective mission statement, our group discussed and debated the following questions:

1. Why do school library programs exist?

2. How will we know if a library program is successful?

3. What can we do to ensure that our library programs are successful?

The result is a mission statement that describes why school library programs exist in our district and how we will know if they are fulfilling their purpose.

The mission of the MISD library program is to:

• teach literacy skills (reading, research, technology, etc.) and

• promote open access to quality resources for the school community.

The success of the library program is determined by campus student achievement in conjunction with state and national library standards.

MISD librarians ensure success by proactive commitment to continuous improvement of the library program.

Does your library program have a written mission statement?

Voicethread is one of the favorite tools that we introduce in our version of the 23 Things class. Joyce Valenza’s recent post in the Neverending Search blog describes Voicethread’s new relationships with New York Public Library and Flickr Creative Commons that give their users access to over 700,000 digitized images. Read the entire post for more details.

For the past several years, librarians in my district have been talking about change and transformation.

We started several years ago, just by dipping our toes into RSS and blogging.

Then we talked about collection development and how it looks different now that so much information can be found through subscription databases and on the free web.

We all went through the “23 Things” and learned about web 2.0 technologies.

Then last year we started trying to put all of that learning together by writing a new vision statement for the library program.

A fabulous group of librarians met several times last year for this project. They took their task very seriously and had many brain-busting sessions in order to get it just right. They put together a profile of our current library program that included the history of Library Services in the district, previous vision statements, an assessment of the current services offered, and demographic information. They compiled information from current research about the characteristics and best practices of effective library programs. They also surveyed teachers and administrators in the district to get their perspective on what the library currently offered and what they wanted from the library program.

All of this information was synthesized and distilled into the following vision statement that was presented to the whole group at our first meeting of the year:

MISD librarians envision a 21st century library program that increases students’ achievement and potential for future success.

• The 21^st century library has two distinct manifestations. The physical library features an inviting, friendly atmosphere staffed by a certified professional who works to help teachers and students navigate an increasingly complex information environment; the virtual library provides access to library resources and tools 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Both physical and virtual libraries promote intellectual freedom and provide equitable access to the resources and tools required for learning.

• In the 21^st century library, reading is a foundational skill for learning, personal growth and enjoyment. It is encouraged at all grade levels through various promotional and instructional activities designed to develop successful readers.
• In the 21^st century library, inquiry provides a framework for learning. Students are taught to locate, select, evaluate and use information appropriately and effectively.
• In the 21^st century library, collaboration is fundamental. Teachers and librarians work together to deliver instruction that focuses on critical thinking skills, literacy skills and curriculum connections.
• In the 21^st century library, learning is social, customized and personalized. Students are connected with information and each other, while creating new understandings and celebrating accomplishments.
• In the 21^st century library, technology is ubiquitous. Library users employ technology to locate materials and information, circulate items, collaborate with each other and create products. Librarians provide leadership and training for teachers and students in the use of current and emerging technologies.
• In the 21^st century library, the collection is varied, balanced and current. It features information in multiple formats for all needs and interests, supports the curriculum and is appealing to library users.
• In the 21^st century library, systems and routines are established that break down barriers and allow students and teachers to use the library independently and at point of need.

What is does your vision for the 21st century school library look like?

Image citation: Forward by Bruce Berrien.

Julie Todaro, presenter

TLA recently conducted a public opinion poll of Texas voters to find out how much support there is out there for all types of libraries.

Other sources of data about school libraries:

AASL – Research and Statistics

David Loertscher’s web site

Michael Eisenberg’s presentations

IASL Online

Library Media Program: Data Sources, the School Library Media Specialist

Library Research Service

Resources for School Librarians

The TLA survey was a statewide telephone survey conducted in October – November 2008.

The survey found that nearly all Texans (99%) are an essential part of the educational experience and more than 9 in 10 agree that school librarians are critical to student achievement. The vast majority would support legislation that would require public schools to provide students with a school library and librarian that meets statewide standards. More than 8 in 10 voters across every demographic segment and geographic region support the legislation, including 88% of Republicans, 95% of Democrats and 96% of Independents.

Strong majorities support increasing public funding for school libraries!

Data from the survey shows that the general public feels that school libraries and professional give every child the opportunity to read and learn.

How can we use this data to promote school libraries?

Use it as a message to administrators, school boards, PTA groups, teachers, students, relevant associations and legislators.

Expand the Strong Libraries Strong Scores mini-conference model to other areas of the state, to other associations and organizations and with other related events.

TLA recommends focusing on the unique contribution of school libraries to round out and encourage student development and achievement. Instead of trying to be another classroom, focus on what makes us unique.

Jennifer LaBoon, presenter

The 81st Legislative Session ended June 1 with “partisan meltdown” and many bills died.

Two key issues for schools were the K-12 databases and a full-time librarian on every campus. The databases funding made it through, but was not increased as requested. The state library will be doing some “creative” budgeting in order to keep the resources at the existing level. While we didn’t get quite what we wanted, we didn’t lose any ground.

The full-time librarian issue is a difficult one. There has been discussion of this for a long time, but many have been reluctant to press it with the legislators. The hope is that we could possibly replicate the standard for counselors, which are mandated at schools of 500 students or more. The timing must be right to move forward on the issue.

HB 915 specifies that TEA must consider of a school district provides a certified school librarian on a campus as part of the accountability rating for a district. The bill was referred to the Public Education committee, but never got a hearing. Inquiries into the feasibility of a similar bill in the Senate were met with heavy resistance – no unfunded mandates.

HB 3/ SB 3 was the “accountability” bill. Rep. Dennis Bonnen worked to amend the bill to include certified librarians as part of the accountability ratings. The amended language was stripped by the Conference Committee, as were most floor amendments added in the House. Bonnen did not give up, though, and worked with Rep. Rose to add library services to her amendment 72. Unfortunately, all amendments that passed the House were removed by the Senate.

School library advocacy efforts are important and all are encouraged to attend TLA Legislative Day. Legislators really do not realize that every school does not have a certified librarian on every campus and need to be made aware of the situation.

The school library study mandated by the last legislative session was presented in December 2008. It was very positive towards school libraries. Other initiatives include the Shirley Igo Award for PTA members who are supportive of their school libraries. TLA had a booth at state PTA conference and PTA had a booth at the TLA conference. The Spokane Moms are confirmed to present at TLA 2010.

Take home ideas:

Vote! for school board, legislators, congress
Create an administrator of the year award for an administrator who advocates for libraries
Create a librarian of the year awar
Create a Friends of School Libraries grou
Reach out to your PTA group and other civic groups
Attend Town Hall events
Invite legislators to school literacy events
Send thank you letters
Reach out to smaller districts around you
Attend Advocacy Pre-Conference at TLA 2010
Plan to attend Legislative Day in 2011 and TLA in Austin in 2011

Volunteer to help advocate for school libraries at these upcoming events:

PTA Summer Leadership Conference
Austin, July 24-25

TASA/TASB Conference
Houston, October 1-4

Panel discussion

Fort Bend ISD offers summer training in electronic resources and information literacy. During new teacher orientation, new librarians meet and receive training on the automation system. New librarians also meet six times a year to discuss topics of particular interest to them.

Dallas ISD provides sessions in the summer and fall and has lots of resources for new librarians in a moodle/blackboard environment.

Northside ISD uses a mentor program. Mentors must obtain permission from their campus principal to participate. They make visits to the new librarian’s library and attend new librarian meetings. They are also provided with a monthly checklist of things to discuss with the new librarian and create a new librarian goodie bag.

Denton ISD has Librarian Fish Camp – 3 days in the summer before school starts in August. During this camp, they present sessions on literature, research, databases, and the automation system. They also provide pullout meetings in September and January. Topics on these days include research process, reading lists, book orders, budget, inventory, plus campus visits to experienced librarians.

Round Rock ISD also has a 1 day new librarians’ workshop that starts with asking about their concerns and what they want to know. They also have a mentor program. New librarians are carefully matched with an experienced librarian and are encouraged to meet often on a given timeline.

Region 2 provides training for library paraprofessionals. Title I specifies what paraprofessionals can actually do. They offer two strands of training for these paras: Zap! You’re a Library Aide for people who have come back from the summer and find that they are assigned to the library, covering the philosophy of library service. In the spring, a session is offered on school library management where the participants can present problems they have encountered and discuss solutions. Customer service strategies are also presented.

Presentation by Stella Farris, Austin ISD

National Board certification attests to the fact that a librarian has been judged by a peer group as one who is accomplished in the field. It gives credibility to a librarian as a professional and leads to leadership opportunities. More importantly, librarians who are certified by the National Board have a better understanding of their roles and make a bigger impact on student achievement.

The National Board standards for librarians cover what librarians know, do and how they grow as professionals.

Basic requirements:

Bachelor’s degree, 3 years teaching experience, 4 portfolios, 6 essays

Portfolio topics: Instructional Collaboration, Appreciation of Literature, Integration of technology, Documented accomplishments. The literature and technology portfolios require video component, in addition to the written pieces.

The essay portion of the certification is timed and taken at a scheduled time. Two prompts are given and the candidate must address both prompts in a limited amount of time.

Info on National Board Certification for Librarians

Cost is about $3000 total, but funding is available from various sources. Some districts pay a stipend for librarians who have national board certification.

A new option is Take One. It allows teachers to sample and learn the standards for a particular area, videotape themselves doing a lesson and provide written commentary on that lesson.

Resources:

Discussion groups

Achieving National Board Certification for School Library Media Specialist – A Study Guide by Gail Dickinson

AASL web site

Education World

Blogs: Teacher Sol, Certifiable, Teaching Safari

Only 12 NBCTs in Texas! Might be something to look into!

School librarians are in short supply across the state of Texas and certification options are limited to nine universities. Dallas ISD created an alternative certification program for librarians in their school district in order to fill some of these positions.

A school librarian task force worked behind the scenes a full year before the program actually began. The program they developed consisted of several components. Participants took 9 hours of university coursework in the summer before beginning as a school librarian. A job shadowing component allowed participants to choose from an approved job shadow pool at each level for 5 days during the year. Mentoring was also part of the program. Experienced librarians were invited to complete a mentor application and were selected by the alternative certification staff. The mentors received training and a $1000 stipend. The district’s moodle system was used to post information for the mentors to use when working with the AC new librarians. AC librarians also participated in traditional district new librarian training along with fully certified librarians who were new to the library/district.

The AC Coordinator met once a month with the AC librarians to discuss questions and concerns, made site visits, gave TExES preparation training, and offered cataloging and children’s literature courses.

AC participants also had to complete portfolios to show growth for the year. The program allowed participants to become certified school librarians in two years.

Participants were actively recruited through newspaper ads, information sessions, district web sites and other communication publications.

The program was funded by the A-Plus grant (Alternative Programs for Librarians in Urban Settings) and was awarded almost $1 million. The program added 45 librarians to the district over three years.

Approximate program expense was about $6000 (if a participant was not in the grant).

Applicants to the program had to provide an application, a resume, transcripts, 3 letters of recommendation. The web site for the program is http://teachfordallas.com/librarian.

Candidates who qualified for the program were interviewed with a ranking instrument. They also had to take a computer test consisting of basic Word skills, web searching skills, and basic lesson planning ability.

Most participants passed the state certification exam on the first attempt.

Presented by Terry Alegria Roper, AC Coordinator, Dallas ISD

Jane Claes and Janet Hilbun have been doing research about state book awards and shared their findings with us.

Did you know that 49 states have a state book award? Mississippi is the only one that doesn’t and they are considering it.

Why are state book awards so important? They get kids to read and think critically about literature in order to make their selection. The book lists of nominees are also great collection development tools.

The Pacific Northwest Young Reader’s award is the oldest of the state book awards, first given in 1940. Only 11 of the awards were chosen exclusively (nominated and selected) by children. In most cases, the books are nominated by adults and children, then voted on by children.

Nomination criteria vary, but in most cases there is a publication date, whether or not the book is still in print, and the author is living. Some states say that books that have won a Newbery or Caldecott are not eligible.

Generally, students must read a certain number of books to vote and librarians handle the voting in school and public libraries.

The major difference between state and national book awards is that children participate in the selection of the winner.

Big recent winners are:

Eragon by Christopher Paolini – 21 awards

Twilight by Stephanie Meyer – 16 awards

Tale of Despereaux by Kate DiCamillo – 15 awards

In the past four years, the top 5 winners have all been considered fantasy or science fiction or magical realism and all of these winners have had movies in production.

It is interesting to note that the top authors who have won state book awards have never won a national book award, such as the Newbery or Caldecott. Some of these authors are Peg Kehret, Andrew Clements, and Dan Gutman.

There are 27 books about dogs that won 47 awards. Five books with the word “ghost” in the title won 11 awards and 16 series books won 21 awards. Ten sequels won 70 awards.

What does this mean for collection development? Taken as a whole, state book awards show clearly what students like and want to read. These books have already been through a rigorous selection process. Looking at these lists also help you keep up with trends in student reading. It is an existing tool that many librarians are not using.

Janet and Jane have a book on this topic coming out this fall: Coast to Coast: Exploring State Book Awards from Libraries Unlimited. Another resource is H.W. Wilson’s Core Collection of state book awards.

A really great and untapped resource for collection development!